Magnetic Effect On Plants

People have mentioned that they no longer can count "one mississippi, two mississippi", etc...and count an even second.

I tried this with "one one thousand, two one thousand", and when I got to ten, I was at twelve seconds.

This is not a matter of time perception as we age, this is how it used to be.

I can offer up a bit of proof.

What used to take 10 seconds, now takes 12 seconds.

This is a difference of 0.2 or 20%.

Here is the interesting part: The speed of earth rotation is based on the circumference of the earth (24,900 miles) divided by one day which is exactly (23.934472) hours.

Divide these and you get 1040 miles per hour.

Funny thing is, some ME affected people remember the circumference of the earth to be 26,500 miles, which would give a speed of 1107 mph.

Here is a clip of Neil Degrasse Tyson saying the earth rotates at 800 MPH. https://soundcloud.com/startalk/why-the-earth-spins-the-way-it

This is from star talk radio.

My guess is that we were at 866 MPH, because 866 * 0.2 = 173.2 Now add 173.2 to 866 = 1039 or close to 1040 MPH.

Based on this we are at a 19.2 hour day, stretched out to equal 24 hours.

26,500/1107 = 24,900/1040 Might this explain the feeling of time speeding up?

I don't have anything scientific to add, but my "party trick" before was that I used to be able to count a perfect minute with less than a fraction of a second of error.

Now I'm almost always off by a few seconds or more.

 

Say what you want but I've been able to do this my entire life until sometime this year, so yeah I believe it.

This is good corroboration for me.

When I do it, I get 12 seconds for every 10 I count.

That gave me the 0.2 or 20% difference to work with.

Me too! i used to be able to count in my mind and i was always correct, not by saying Mississippi or thousand but just by imagining the clock and the second hand, never wrong for less than 30 second but... but now when i saw this post. everytime i count to 10 it has actually passed 13 :(( i feel like I'm gonna be old much sooner :( :|

Or you're just getting old.

This is nearly exactly what my mom and I also figured out a few weeks ago!!

Even down to it being a 19.2 hour day stretched out to 24 hours.

 

 I really do believe this is true.

The days certainly feel like we have lost several hours.

Are you way more tired too?

I figure out of 8 hours of expected sleep, we are losing 1.6 hours per night.

No, but I think that is because I finally fixed my thyroid problems I have had for the last 7 or 8 years.

 

I started eating better and exercising so my need for sleep has gone down slightly.

 
I do feel however that I am not able to get as much done in a day as I used to be able to.

Please tell me how you found out you had thyroid problems and how you fixed it specifically.

I'm not sure if I have it but I want to know more info in case I have it.

What do you mean? We're only experiencing 19.2 hrs but in the context of 24 hrs?

That relative to what used to be 5 seconds is actually 6 literal seconds now.

So time seems to be going faster by about 1 second for every 5 or like OP said what used to be 10 seconds is now 12 literal seconds.

So even though we still have a 24 hour day, it is relative and we can detect that time is indeed going "faster" compared to what we used to experience as a 24 hour day.

Approximately 19 hours is what it "feels" like in comparison to what OP and I remember from past years.

And like OP said, if Earth is a different size (which I believe it is) then it would take a different amount of time to make a full rotation, so even though we would still calculate it based off 24 hours, it could seem faster or slower relatively speaking. If that was the case then overall productivity should be dropping.

For example a factory that produced a certain number of widgets per hour, should be now producing 20% less, assuming the machines and the people are working at the same pace.

I haven't heard of any major productivity drops, so I don't think this theory is quite right.

I'll give you a real world example.

It used to take me 25 minutes to drive to work.

 

 I would leave at the same time, trying to arrive at the same time every day when the gate to the lot would open.

Recently, I have to add on an extra 5 to 10 minutes to do the same drive.

Was not sure why, because nothing else traffic wise has changed.

This is another example of the multiple (time change) of 0.2. 25 min * 0.2 = 5.

This is the extra 5 minutes of drive time. funnily enough I've noticed that recently i could leave the house a bit later and still arrive at my train station on time.

Before it used to be 15mins walk, now its around 12mins walk?

Maybe I am just fitter tho...

I have to say you are wrong.

The length of a second is not given by the length of our day.

 

According to the scientific definition a second is "the duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium 133 atom".

Now, those transitions of the Cs atom are EXTREMELY precise and constant.

There are devices called atomic clocks, which use that definition to measure time with an error of only 10-9 seconds in a day.

These atomic clocks are EXTREMELY precise and they are what it is used to calibrate ALL clocks in the world.

If a day would've been 19 hours instead of 24, scientists would've noticed.

Easily.

So unless all scientists in the world are in on a huge conspiracy, you are wrong.

Also, if the length of a second would've changed, all other units of measure that are time dependent would've changed as well.

For example, the metre is defined as "1/299 792 458 of the distance travelled by light in a second".

In conclusion, a metre should've been shorter as well if seconds are shorter.

Another thing that needs to be mentioned is that "one mississippi, two mississippi", or "one one thousand, two one thousand" was never a very precise way of measuring time.

It is only a method you can use to roughly measure time when you don't have a timer or a clock at hand.

They are not to be taken as an international standard.

The flaw in your reasoning here is that time is relative, an atomic clock will show a different time than another identical atomic clock if one of the clocks are traveling faster than the other.

Einstein's theory of relativity. I wasn't talking about relativistic speeds here.

Edit: there's something else you missed.

It's true that time is dependant on speed.

But the time dilation you talk about is only valid from the perspective of an outside observer.

From the point of reference of the atomic clock that travels at relativistic speeds, a second still has the same length.

To put things in the context of this thread.

The time difference OP talks about would only be noticed on a clock that measures our rotation from outside our planet.

But since all the atomic clocks are on Earth, they still measure 24 hours and not 19.

Also, Earth is slowing down, not speeding up.

Every 100 years Earth is 1.4 milliseconds slower.

This is an effect that has been observed and corrections are being made all the time.

If there is any truth to the multiverse (many worlds) theory, then the ME could involve people from many different earths each converging on our current reality.

This might explain how some could have a memory of tank man being crushed in Tiananmen Square, while others only remember him being moved away and not being killed.

 

With this in mind, there could be an earth with a circumference of 20,750 miles which would rotate at 866 mph at the equator.

The speed of 866.95 * 0.2 = 173.39.

This is my subjective assessment of the 20% difference in speed. 866.95 + 173.39 = 1040 mph, which is our current speed.

My subjective experience suggests an old earth that was smaller and rotated slower than the current faster and bigger earth.

Those with a memory of earth with a circumference of 26,500 would be from an earth that rotated 6% slower.

This would give them a subjective feeling of time going slower, and they would have a feeling of a 25.37 hour day.

This is one explanation of how different people can have a much different ME experience, and subjective feeling of time changing.

Are people sure tank man was crushed? I researched it only months before I found out about the general ME effect and now I'm kicking myself about not remembering what happened to tank man.

But Google images showed some gory images of the incident, probably not of tank man but other people involved, including one that was crushed while on a bicycle I think.

Anyway when I first heard of the tank man ME.

I immediately thought "ahh, it's probably Chinese censorship, trying to sugar coat what happened" but I'm not sure....Maybe there's evidence somewhere.

Perhaps Google is biased against showing tank man harmed?

Maybe books or something show something different?

I was looking at youtube videos of tank man recently, and there were so many comments like "what happened to the video where he was killed"? " I remember the tanks running him over", etc..... Many comments to that effect. In one of the many worlds, it is possible that tank man was run over and killed. People have vivid memories of this.

I saw it on tv when i was a kid. The news played it.

I know technically it didnt happen, but I sure cant forget something like that.

The first view was from the "passenger" side, slightly from the rear, but later they replayed it from other angles once they had more video, like a few days later.

They would show real life gore on TV ???

I remember seeing him run over as a kid on the news also.

I was genuinely stunned by the video now.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MandelaEffect/comments/5ep9ii/time_is_speeding_up_evidence/

Marble or limestone mixed with liquid plastic is less expensive than natural marble and easier to work with than stone cultured. Marble is often used to create unique bathroom and kitchen fixtures. Vanity top and pedestal sink are both made out of cultured marble cast in fiberglass molds.

Marble, granite and stone floor tiles are concrete proof of how we can use innovative technologies to improve on the properties of natural materials.

Through a process very much like the natural one but infinitely faster, technical ceramics marbles and stones are made with natural materials such as minerals, clay, kaolin and feldspar, which make up about 99% of their "mass", completed with colour of mineral origin.

Firing in a hot kiln creates a material that is homogeneous throughout its entire mass, with veins running right through it in a random fashion which does not repeat its texture.

Created to reproduce the random textures of nature and overcome the limits of conventional ceramics, man-made marbles, granite and stones are among the strongest, most dependable materials available for cladding in construction and are used above all in indoor and outdoor flooring.

The popularity of man-made Marble tile, granite and stone tiles for floor and walls, is a result of their high technological performance due to elimination of all the defects of the natural materials, such as fractures, porosity, schistosity, pitting and uneven colour.

In addition, man-made floor materials provides the essential morphological and aesthetic features of natural materials, such as non-repetitiveness, calibration and three-dimensionality.

A unique productive process and careful selection of raw materials guarantee excellent technical qualities such as physical and chemical resistance, non-absorbency, reduced thickness and dependability of sampling.

Moreover, man-made stone complies perfectly with the most important international product quality standards and is perfectly ecological.

Man-made marbles, travertines, granites and stones tiles meet a variety of different practical and aesthetic needs.

The high mechanical resistance of this compact material permits use of man-made stones in areas subject to particularly high static, dynamic and impact loads.

These features, combined with reduced thickness and the possibility of obtaining slabs in large formats explain the popularity of these materials in innovative forms of cladding such as ventilated façades and raised floors.

High scratch-resistance also makes these materials ideal for flooring in high traffic areas.

They are perfectly non-absorbent and resistant to most chemical cleaning products, making regular and special maintenance operations easy.

Marble, granite and stone floor tiles for floor and walls are used in a wide variety of different contexts:

- Residential Areas: the desire for individuality and customisation are expressed most strongly, in the home, by carefully selecting just the right furniture and fixtures.

Flooring and wall coverings also contribute toward creating the distinctive style of a room.

- Shopping Centres: In shopping areas such as malls, supermarkets and showrooms the technical functions of the flooring are every bit as important as aesthetics.

It must communicate an attractive and distinctive image but at the same time the material has to be durable and able to withstand the stresses that heavily exploited surfaces are subjected.

Safety is also essential, particular attention may need to be paid to surfaces that have technical properties such as non-slip.

- Community Facilities: greater comfort, safety, appearance and ease of maintenance are fundamental requisites for creating comfortable community areas used by people with differing needs, from children to the elderly, from athletes to the disabled, from students to professionals.

These community facilities could include hospitals, retirement homes, schools, universities, libraries, public offices, sports centres, cafeterias and churches.

https://www.floornature.com/ceramic-innovation/mood/man-made-marbles-and-stones-floorings-5019/